Power of Attorney Cannot Transfer Principal’s Property to Own Sons Without Consent | 2026 SCMR 1119

Attorney cant transfer property to his close relatives.


⚖️ مختارنامے کے تحت مقرر شخص اپنے بیٹوں کے نام موکل کی جائیداد منتقل نہیں کرسکتا

📌 2026 SCMR 1119
سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان نے قرار دیا کہ عام مختارنامہ کسی شخص کو موکل کی جائیداد منتقل کرنے کا لامحدود اختیار نہیں دیتا۔

🔹 واضح اجازت ضروری

سپریم کورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ مختارنامے کے تحت مقرر شخص اگر موکل کی جائیداد اپنے قریبی رشتہ داروں، خصوصاً اپنے بیٹوں، کے حق میں منتقل کرے تو موکل کی واضح اجازت اور رضامندی ثابت کرنا ضروری ہے۔

🔹 عام مختارنامہ کافی نہیں

سپریم کورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ عام مختارنامے سے جائیداد منتقل کرنے کا اختیار محض قیاس کی بنیاد پر اخذ نہیں کیا جاسکتا۔ اس مقصد کے لیے واضح اور مخصوص اختیار ہونا ضروری ہے۔

🔹 صرف چیک کی ادائیگی کافی نہیں

سپریم کورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ صرف چیک کے ذریعے رقم کی ادائیگی کسی جائز فروخت کا حتمی ثبوت نہیں، جب تک اصل لین دین اور فروخت کو دیگر قابلِ اعتماد شواہد سے ثابت نہ کیا جائے۔

🔹 قریبی رشتہ داروں کے حق میں منتقلی

سپریم کورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ مختارنامے کے تحت مقرر شخص اپنے قریبی رشتہ داروں کے فائدے کے لیے موکل کی جائیداد منتقل کرے تو ایسی منتقلی کو خاص طور پر واضح اجازت اور رضامندی کی روشنی میں پرکھا جائے گا۔

⭐ اہم قانونی اصول

مختارنامے کے تحت مقرر شخص موکل کی واضح اجازت کے بغیر عام مختارنامے کی بنیاد پر موکل کی جائیداد اپنے قریبی رشتہ داروں کے نام منتقل نہیں کرسکتا۔

Must read judgement.


2026 S CMR 1119

[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Present: Shahid Bilal Hassan and Shakeel Ahmad, JJ

JAVED IQBAL and others ---Appellants

Versus

Mst. FARHAT IQBAL (deceased) through I.Rs. --Respondent

C.A. No. 852 of 2025, decided on 6th April, 2026.

Vo

(Against judgment dated 06.10.2025 passed in C.R. No. 408 of 2015/BWP by Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur)

(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-

-S.39---Contract Act (IX of 1872), Ss. 211, 214 & 215-General power of attorney--Transfer of principal's property by attorney in favour of his own sons---Abuse of fiduciary authority, fraud and absence of consent, allegation of---Pivotal issue for determination was whether, in the absence of clear express authority and proven informed consent of the principal, the attorney could validly transfer the principal's property in favour of his own close relatives?---Held: No cogent or reliable evidence had been produced to establish that the respondent/principal had granted express consent, much less prior approval, for the transfer of the suit property in favour of the sons of the attorney-The alleged payr payment through cheque, made by the appellant/brother in favour of the respondent/sister, was not conclusive proof oof of a valid sale transaction, particularly in the absence absence of of any any agreement to sell or other independent corroborative evidence reflecting a lawful bargain-Mere production of such payment, without establishing the underlying transaction, does not satisfy the legal standard required to validate an alienation of immovable property---The impugned transaction was clearly hit by the settled principles governing the fiduciary obligations of an attorney and could not be sustained---Present appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

(b) Power of attorney---

--Attorney alienating entrusted property to close relatives-Legality-Attorney, powers of-Scope-A general power of attorney does not by itself confer authority to alienate property unless a clear and specific clause to that effect exists, and even then such authority cannot be readily inferred in the absence of clear intention and consent of the principal---Transfer by an attorney in favour of his close relatives requires express permission from the principal.

Fida Muhammad v. Pir Muhammad Khan PLD 1985 SC 341; Muhammad Taj v. Arshad Mehmood and 3 others 2009 SCMR 114; Mst. Naila Kausar and another v. Sardar Muhammad Bakhsh and others 2016 SCMR 1781: Maqsood Ahmad v. Salman Ali PLD 2003 SC 31: Jamil Akhtar v. Las Baba PL.D 2003 SC 494 and Muhammad Ashraf v. Muhammad Malik PLD 2008 SC 389 rel.

S.A. Mahmood Khan Sadozai, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellants.

Muhammad Aslam Khan Dhukkar, Advocate Supreme Court for the L.Rs. of Respondent No. 1.


For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post