 |
| 2026 clc 271 |
— کرایہ داری مقدمات میں آئینی درخواست کی حدود
مختصر کہانی
اہم قانونی نکات
👉 آرٹیکل 199 دوسری اپیل نہیں ہے۔
👉 Concurrent Findings
👉 مالک اور کرایہ دار کے تعلق کا اقرار اہم ہے۔
👉 آئینی درخواست کا دائرہ محدود ہے۔
👉 سپروائزری اختیار احتیاط سے استعمال ہوتا ہے۔
اصولِ قانون
Must read judgement.
2026 CLC 271
[Sindh]
Before Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, J
in
Sayed MUHAMMAD ALI --Petitioner
Versus
SHAHZAD ABDUL RASHEED and 3 others ---Respondents
Constitutional Petition No. S-1117 of 2023, decided on 20th February, 2025.
(a) Constitution of Pakistan-
---Art. 199--Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.15---Ejectment proceedings--Concurrent findings---Invoking constitutional jurisdiction of High Court-Scope-Jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution cannot be invoked as substitute of another appeal against the order of the Appellate Court---Therefore, mere fact that upon perusal of evidence there exists possibility of a different view would never he sufficient to seek concurrent findings disturbed by invoking constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Constitutional Petition was dismissed.
Shakeel Ahmed and another v. Muhammad Tariq Farogh and others 2010 SCMR 1925 ref.
(b) Constitution of Pakistan
---Art. 199-Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.15---Ejectment of tenant---Concurrent findings--Invoking constitutional jurisdiction of High Court-Scope-While pressing constitutional jurisdiction in such like matter, the petitioner must establish that the findings of two Courts below, particularly of Appellate Court, are prima facie not in accordance with law and available material---There is no denial to existence of relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and in such like matter the claim is to be accepted once landlord states on oath and same goes un-shattered in cross-examinantion---Constitutional petition was dismissed.
Pakistan Institute of International Affairs v. Naveed Merchant and others 2012 SCMR 1498 ref.
(c) Constitution of Pakistan-
Art. 199-Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.15---Ejectment of tenant-Concurrent findings---Invoking constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---The ambit of a constitutional petition is not that of a forum of appeal, nor does it automatically become such a forum in instances where no further appeal is provided, and is restricted inter alia to appreciate whether any manifest illegality is legality is apparent from the order impugned-Where the fora of subordinate jurisdiction has exercised its discretion in one way and that discretion has been judicially exercised on sound principles the supervisory forum would not interfere with that discretion, unless same is contrary to law or usage having the force of law-The impugned judgments appeared to be well-reasoned and no manifest infirmity was discernable therein or that they could not have been rested upon the rationale relied upon---Constitutional petition was dismissed.
Gul Taiz Khan Marwat v. Registrar Peshawar High Court PLD 2021 SC 391; Naheed Nusrat Hashmi v. Secretary Education (Elementary) Punjab PLD 2006 SC 1124 and Naseer Ahmed Siddiqui v. Aftab Alam PLD 2013 SC 323 ref.
(d) Constitution of Pakistan.
----Art. 199---Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.15---Ejectment of tenant---Concurrent findings---Invoking constitutional jurisdiction of High Court-De novo appreciation of evidence, seeking of-Scope-For de novo appreciation of evidence, the constitutional jurisdiction of High Court is not an amenable forum in such regard---Constitutional petition was dismissed.
Zayad Khan Abbasi for Petitioner.
Faqir Ghazi for Respondent No. 1.