subsequent vendee who asserts that he is a bona fide purchaser.
![]() |
| subsequent vendee who asserts that he is a bona fide purchaser |
بعد کا خریدار نیک نیتی کیسے ثابت کر سکتا ھے۔
⚖️ قانونی نکتہ
🧾 اہم قانونی اصول (Key Legal Principles)
سپریم کورٹ نے قرار دیا کہ بعد ازاں خریدار کو یہ ثابت کرنا ہوگا کہ:
🎯 منفرد نکتہ (Distinctive Point)
🧠 ایک لائن میں خلاصہ
اس فیصلے میں عدالت نے یہ واضح کیا کہ اگر کوئی بعد کا خریدار (Subsequent Vendee) یہ دعویٰ کرے کہ وہ بona fide خریدار ہے، یعنی اس نے جائیداد قانونی قیمت پر حاصل کی ہے، تو اسے ابتدائی ثبوت (Initial Onus) فراہم کرنا ہوگا کہ:
1. وہ جائیداد کا حقیقی خریدار ہے
2. ادائیگی واقعی فروخت کنندہ
3. معاملہ بدنیتی پر مبنی نہ ہو،
4. خریدار نے مناسب احتیاط برتی ہو
Must read part of judgement
**** Citation Name : 2025 PLD 31 SUPREME-COURT
****** Side Appellant :** Faqir Syed ANWAR UD DIN
****** Side Opponent :** Syed RAZA HAIDER
S. 27(b)---specific performance of contract---Relief against parties and persons claiming under them by subsequent title---In cases involving protection under section 27(b) of the specific Relief Act 1877 ('Act of 1877') the subsequent vendee who asserts that he is a bona fidepurchaser i.e. a transferee for value has to discharge the initial onus---Latter has to discharge the initial onus to the effect that; he had acquired the property for due consideration and thus is a transferee for value; he or she, as the case may be, has to show that the sale was for a price paid to the vendor and not otherwise; there was no dishonesty of purpose of tainted intention to enter into the transaction thereby meaning that the latter had acted in good faith or bonafidely and, lastly, that he/she had taken reasonable care to inquire i.e. had acted as a person of ordinary prudence in making inquiries expected of a purchaser who intends to acquire a good title for the value being paid for.
