G-KZ4T1KYLW3 Preference of Registered Sale Deed over Prior Agreement to Sell — Lahore High Court 2025 clc 1870

Preference of Registered Sale Deed over Prior Agreement to Sell — Lahore High Court 2025 clc 1870


2025 clc 1870

رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ کو معاہدۂ بیع پر ترجیح

لاہور ہائی کورٹ نے مقدمہ Zulfiqar Ali v. Mirza Altaf Hussain میں قرار دیا کہ اگر ایک فریق کے حق میں باقاعدہ رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ موجود ہو تو اسے محض پہلے کے معاہدۂ بیع پر ترجیح حاصل ہوگی۔

مقدمہ کا پس منظر

مقدمہ میں درخواست گزار کا مؤقف تھا کہ جائیداد کے متعلق اس کے حق میں معاہدۂ بیع پہلے سے موجود تھا، اس لیے بعد میں ہونے والی فروخت کو کالعدم قرار دیا جائے اور اس کے حق میں مخصوص کارکردگی (Specific Performance) کی ڈگری جاری کی جائے۔ دوسری طرف مدعا علیہ کے پاس اسی جائیداد کے متعلق رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ موجود تھی۔

رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ کی قانونی حیثیت

عدالت نے ریکارڈ کا جائزہ لیتے ہوئے قرار دیا کہ رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ ایک مکمل اور قانونی طور پر مؤثر دستاویز ہوتی ہے جو جائیداد کی ملکیت کی منتقلی کو ثابت کرتی ہے، جبکہ معاہدۂ بیع صرف آئندہ فروخت کا وعدہ ہوتا ہے اور بذاتِ خود ملکیت منتقل نہیں کرتا۔

فروخت کنندہ کے مؤقف کی اہمیت

ہائی کورٹ نے مزید قرار دیا کہ جب فروخت کنندہ کی طرف سے معاہدۂ بیع اور رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ دونوں سے انکار نہ کیا جائے اور سیل ڈیڈ باقاعدہ رجسٹرڈ ہو تو ایسی صورت میں رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ کو ترجیح حاصل ہوگی۔

عدالت کا حتمی فیصلہ

چنانچہ عدالت نے اس بنیاد پر مخصوص کارکردگی کی ڈگری جاری کرنے اور رجسٹرڈ سیل ڈیڈ کو منسوخ کرنے سے انکار کرتے ہوئے سول ریویژن کو مسترد کر دیا۔ عدالت نے واضح کیا کہ جائیداد کے معاملات میں رجسٹرڈ دستاویزات کو عام معاہدات پر فوقیت حاصل ہوتی ہے۔

Must read judgment.

2025 CLC 1870

[Lahore]

Before Sultan Tanvir Ahmad, J

ZULFIQAR ALI ---Petitioner

Versus

Mirza ALTAF HUSSAIN and 3 others-Respondents

Civil Revisions Nos. 25008 and 25021 of 2023, decided on 9th September, 2024.

(a) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)--

-Ss.3 & 5-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115-Civil revision--Limitation-Civil revisions were filed within time, however, office objections were not removed within the specified time--Effect-Time consumed in removing the office objections, exclusion of---Applications filed for condoning the delay---Plea of misplacing the files of the cases due to shifting of office by the counsel- el-Validity-In cases in which certain objections are raised by the office, which render the institution of case in itself invalid or incompetent should be held to be time barred unless the objections or deficiencies indicated by the office are met within the time specified by the office-At the bottom of objection-sheets, received by the petitioner, it was clearly stipulated that the objections were to be removed within three (3) days, however, the petitioner despite receiving the files remained unable to return the same after removing the objections within the given time period-In the applications for condonation of delay it was stated that the counsel was shifting his office, whereas, in the course of argument the said counsel attributed the delay to some fellow advocate In the entire applications no dates of shifting the office or when the files were traced were given-Delay in re-filing the civil revisions was about fourteen months, thus, such a plea was repelled being implausible and unbelievable that the file could not be located in such a long period---Civil revisions were dismissed in limine, in circumstances.

Asad Ali and 9 others v. The Bank of Punjah and others PLD 2020 SC 736; Saleem Khan v. Mst. Zeenat and others 2023 CLC 1217; Province of Punjab and others v. Muhammad Arif and Company PLD 2022 Lah. 596; Lahore Development Authority v. Muhammad Rashid 1997 SCMR 1224 and Province of Punjab through District Officer Revenue, Rawalpindi and others v. Muhammad Sarwar 2014 SCMR 1358 rel..

(b) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)-

-S. 48-Specific Relief Act (1 of 1877), Ss. 12, 39 & 54-Sale deed prior in time-Preference-Appellate court had refused to grant specific performance or to cancel the sale deed in favour of respondent for the reason that the agreement in his favour was prior to the one favour the revision-petitioner-Sale deed in favour of the respondent was admittedly registered and there was no deni on the part of the seller vis-à-vis agreement and the sale deed-Civil revision was dismissed.

Syed Hashim Raza Shamsi for Petitioner.



For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post