G-KZ4T1KYLW3 Life Insurance Policy: Inheritance or Exclusive Right of the Nominee?

Life Insurance Policy: Inheritance or Exclusive Right of the Nominee?

Life Insurance Policy: Inheritance or Exclusive Right of the Nominee?


بیمہ پالیسی کی رقم: ترکہ یا صرف نامزد شخص کا حق؟


لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے حالیہ فیصلے (2025 PLD 40, Lahore High Court) نے اس اہم سوال کا جواب دیا ہے کہ آیا بیمہ پالیسی کی رقم مرحوم کے تمام ورثاء میں تقسیم ہوگی یا صرف نامزد (Nominee) فرد کا حق ہوگی۔

پس منظر:


ایک شخص نے اپنی زندگی میں لائف انشورنس پالیسی خریدی اور اپنی بیوی کو نامزد کیا۔ وفات کے بعد، مرحوم کی والدہ نے جانشینی سرٹیفکیٹ کے لیے درخواست دی، جسے ماتحت عدالتوں نے یہ کہتے ہوئے مسترد کر دیا کہ بیمہ کی رقم "ترکہ" میں شامل نہیں ہوتی اور صرف نامزد شخص کو ہی اس کا حق حاصل ہے۔

عدالتی فیصلہ:


لاہور ہائی کورٹ نے ماتحت عدالتوں کے فیصلے کو کالعدم قرار دیتے ہوئے کہا کہ:

اسلامی قانون کے مطابق نامزدگی کا مطلب ملکیت دینا نہیں ہوتا بلکہ یہ محض ایک قانونی تقاضا ہوتا ہے۔

وراثتی اصولوں کے تحت بیمہ پالیسی کی رقم "ترکہ" شمار ہوگی اور تمام ورثاء اپنے شرعی حصے کے مطابق اس کے حق دار ہوں گے۔

نامزد شخص (بیوہ) واحد مالک نہیں بن سکتی بلکہ وہ محض وصول کنندہ (Administrator) ہوگی، جو کہ قانونی ورثاء میں رقم تقسیم کرنے کی ذمہ دار ہوگی۔


نتائج اور اثرات:


یہ فیصلہ اس اصول کو مضبوط کرتا ہے کہ اسلامی وراثتی قوانین کے تحت کسی بھی نامزدگی کی بنیاد پر کسی وارث کو دوسرے ورثاء کے حقوق سے محروم نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔ اس سے مستقبل میں ایسے مقدمات میں مزید وضاحت ملے گی اور قانونی پیچیدگیاں کم ہوں گی۔

یہ فیصلہ ان لوگوں کے لیے ایک راہنمائی ہے جو بیمہ پالیسی لیتے وقت اپنے ورثاء کے حقوق کے حوالے سے شکوک و شبہات رکھتے ہیں۔

Must read judgement 

Citation Name : 2025 PLD 40 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Side Appellant : Mst. RAZIA BEGUM
Side Opponent : PUBLIC AT LARGE
S. 72---Life Insurance Policy, proceeds of---Tarka---Nominee assigned by the deceased---Scope and effect---Deceased in his lifetime purchased an insurance policy wherein he nominated his wife as his nominee---Mother of the deceased filed an application for issuance of succession certificate, which was concurrently declined---Claim of the petitioner (being mother of the deceased) was that she was entitled to inherit 1/6th share of the insurance policy amount, whereas, respondent (wife/widow) denied her right on the ground that being nominee she was solely entitled to receive the whole insurance policy amount---Deceased left behind mother (petitioner), widow (respondent/ nominee), a daughter and two sons (respondents)---Courts below non-suited the petitioner on the ground that the amount of the Insurance Policy did not fall within the ambit of "Tarka", and was not liable to be inherited by the legal heirs and only the nominee was entitled to receive the amount of said Life Insurance Policy---Legality---Concept of nominee is alien to Muslim Law, according to which the legal heirs are the only persons entitled to receive the property left by their predecessor and no Muslim heir can exclude the other heir on the ground that he is a nominee---A nominee, if appointed, does not become the sole owner of the assets left by the deceased but he/she is only authorized to collect the amount or to hold the property of the deceased as an administrator and then to distribute the same amongst all the legal heirs---The nomination does not make the nominee as donee nor the nomination amounts to a gift, in the absence of delivery of possession of the property gifted---The nominee cannot claim as exclusive owner the amount of the insurance policy---In the light of Muslim Law of inheritance , all the legal heirs of the deceased are entitled to receive the property ("Tarka") left by the deceased, according to their shares---Both the Courts below had erred in law while dismissing the succession petition of the petitioner and had failed to properly appreciate the question involved in the lis as the present case relates to Life Insurance Policy and the nominee was appointed by the nominator just to fulfill the legal requirement of S. 72 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000---High Court set-aside the impugned judgments of the Courts below, and the petitioner, being mother of the deceased, was held entitled to receive her due share out of the policy proceeds---Revision petition, filed by mother of deceased was allowed accordingly.


For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.


Popular articles 


































 




































Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post