Cancellation of bail | Grounds for rejection of application for cancellation of interim bail. 1. Delay in FIR: A delay of 4 hours 20 minutes raises suspicion of consultation without explanation. 2. Civil dispute: There was a civil dispute between the parties over the construction of the wall. 3. Medical Evidence: Only an injury was bailable under Section 337-A(i), serious provisions did not apply. 4. Lack of witness: There was no affidavit or evidence of misuse of bail. 2024 M L D 238

2024 M L D 238

1. ضمانت منسوخی کا اصول: ضمانت تب ہی منسوخ کی جا سکتی ہے جب ضمانت دینے کا حکم ظالمانہ ہو یا اس میں واضح غیر قانونی عمل شامل ہو۔

2. ایف آئی آر میں تاخیر: وقوعہ کا وقت 1:00 بجے بتایا گیا لیکن ایف آئی آر 5:20 بجے درج کی گئی، جس میں 4 گھنٹے اور 20 منٹ کی تاخیر کی کوئی وضاحت نہیں دی گئی۔ اس سے ملزمان کے نام شامل کرنے میں غور و فکر اور مشاورت کا عنصر خارج نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔

3. فریقین میں دیوار کی تعمیر پر تنازعہ: ریکارڈ سے پتہ چلا کہ فریقین کے درمیان دیوار یا مکان کی تعمیر پر ایک سول تنازعہ موجود تھا۔

4. طبی رپورٹ اور دفعات: طبی سرٹیفکیٹ میں صرف ایک چوٹ دکھائی گئی جو زیادہ سے زیادہ دفعہ 337

-A(i)

کے تحت آتی تھی، جو کہ قابلِ ضمانت جرم ہے۔ دفعہ

337-D اور 337-F

اس کیس میں لاگو نہیں ہوئیں۔

5. ضمانت کی تصدیق: ٹرائل کورٹ نے عبوری ضمانت کی توثیق کے لیے ٹھوس وجوہات دیں اور ضمانت کے غلط استعمال کا کوئی ثبوت یا گواہ کا حلفیہ بیان نہیں تھا۔

6. فیصلہ: ضمانت منسوخی کی درخواست مسترد کر دی گئی۔

7. حوالہ جات:

2005 SCMR 1539

2009 SCMR 786

جمال الدین کیس

1983 SCMR 1979

میران بخش بمقابلہ ریاست

PLD 1989 SC 347

2024 M L D 238

[Balochistan]

Before Iqbal Ahmed Kasi, J

NISAR AHMED---Applicant

Versus

The STATE and others---Respondents

Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 484 of 2022, decided on 4th April, 2023.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

----S. 497(5)---Bail, cancellation of---Principle---Bail can only be cancelled if bail granting order appears to be perverse and gross illegality has been committed.

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

----S. 497(5)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 337-A(i), 337-D &

337-F---Murderous assault---Petition for cancellation of bail---Complainant mentioned the time of occurrence as 01:00 p.m., whereas, the FIR was registered at 05:20 p.m., which showed delay of about 04 hours and 20 minutes without giving any explanation, as such, element of due deliberation and consultation in nomination of accused persons by the complainant could not be ruled out---Record further indicated that a civil dispute over the construction of wall/house existed between the parties--- Medical certificate of injured showed that only one injury was observed and the same at the most came under definition of S. 337-A(i), P.P.C., which was bailable in nature---Prima facie Ss. 337-D & 337-F, P.P.C. were not attracted in the present case---Trial Court had given valid reasons for confirmation of ad-interim pre-arrest bail of accused persons---Allegation of abusing or misusing the concession of bail by the accused persons was not supported by affidavit of any witness---Petition for cancellation of bail was dismissed, in circumstances.

2005 SCMR 1539; 2009 SCMR 786; Jamal-ud-Din's case 1983 SCMR 1979 and Meeran Bux v. State PLD 1989 SC 347 rel.

Amanullah Tareen for Applicant.

Nasrullah, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State/ Respondent No. 1.

Mirwais Khan Tareen for Respondents Nos. 2 to 4.

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.